NEi Software Nastran Finite Element Analysis

Nastran Finite Element Analysis and Simulation Software

Youtube
United States United States | International  

Login | Contact Us | New to FEA? | Demo 


Loading

Surface Contact Simulation


A Higher Standard Made Easy with NEi Nastran

NEi Nastran Suface ContactFor many structural Finite Element Analysis (FEA) applications, there are always decisions made by the design or analytical engineer on just how to simplify a real structure into a simulation model. The boundaries and loading conditions of a real structure can be complex, as it is oftentimes part of an assembly of many interacting components.

Some typical simplifications for an FEA to be decided upon:

  • Can the material be described as purely isotropic and/or linear?
  • Is it sufficient to use structural-only element properties as opposed to multi-physics?
  • Does the real structure behave according to symmetric plane boundaries?
  • To analyze a single component of a sub-assembly, will it be accurate enough to simplify the load transfer from one part to the next, or must contact be simulated?

The last item in the list is the topic of this article. For FE models, market driven accuracy requirements are demanding more use of real contact simulation between components so as to attain better end results. The basic question to be answered by the FE engineer is: “How do I prescribe the most appropriate load distribution onto my part of interest into the FE simulation?”

NEi Nastran is a state of the art Finite Element package with an entire suite of engineering solutions along with some easy to use and powerful contact simulation capabilities.

The FEA Requirement – Accurate Load Distribution

In deciding how a load is to be described on a certain structural component, a typical choice formerly used often in older FE codes is to simplify the load distribution as a simple point load, line load or pressure load onto certain nodes or surfaces of the part in the analysis. For example, it has been popular to “simulate” the crankshaft bearing load into a connecting rod of an engine by using a simple linear arc of loads, say 60º around the reaction force vector. (Figure 1)

NEi Nastran Surface Contact

Figure 1. Applied FE load distribution in rod bore assumed constant across a 60º arc and constant through the “Z” thickness; only a rough estimate yet typical of “standard” FEA practice

The load distribution assumption made in the FE model as shown in Figure 1 will be over-simplified, and hence inaccurate for a number of reasons:

First, due to the nature of the assembly between the real rod, bearing and crank journal, there will often be much more force reacting in the center of the “arc” of load developed and less force reacting at the extremities.

Second, the angle of the real load distribution “arc” is directly related to the clearance and the stiffness between the mating components; more clearance results in a smaller arc with much greater local forces at the center of contact. These differences by themselves will likely result in a different stress in the radii of interest for the connecting rod when comparing the real expected response to the over-simplified case, since the radii of interest are quite near to the load zone.

Third, even when making a so-called “A to B” comparison between designs, the very change in design can affect the load distribution. This in turn will affect the “A to B” comparison itself, so it remains wise for the FE engineer to consider the real contact conditions much more closely than what can be done with “linear load” methods or codes.

The Contact Advantage – Accuracy

Accurate load distributions between two components are obtained in an FE model by directly simulating the actual contact between them using multiple deformable bodies. This is often called “surface” contact, because the user defines which surface on “body A” is expected to come into contact with another surface on “body B”. In the connecting rod example, the user would setup surface contact between the crank journal and the rod bore.

NEi Nastran Surface Contact

Figure 2. With real multi-body contact conditions embedded in the FEA via contact surfaces, the skewed load distribution is accurately simulated. Color contour as shown represents contact forces with realistic load distribution. Connecting rod application is in tension combined with some crankshaft twisting.

Figure 2 shows an example of output obtained when running the connecting rod FEA using surface contact to attain an accurate load distribution in the rod bore. For the application loading as simulated, the load reaction in the rod bore is not evenly distributed at all as shown by the contour map representing contact forces. The resulting stress in the body of the rod near this area is much more accurate compared to using simple linear load assumptions.

It is clear that using contact surfaces to simulate load distribution provides a more accurate mechanical response in an analysis. However, the FE engineer still must balance the economics of spending the extra time setting up models using this approach, with the evident technical advantages. NEi Nastran offers a “best of both worlds” solution to this apparent dilemma.

The NEi Nastran Contact Advantage – Accuracy and Ease

Starting with NEi Nastran 9.0, and now with expanded capability in version 9.1, setting up contact between two components has never been easier for the user. This capability is called Automated Surface Contact Generation, or ASCG. With this feature the user now has no need to select individual nodes, elements or surfaces to come into a contact; it is done automatically.

NEi Nastran Surface Contact

Figure 3. Fixture on linear slides loaded with acceleration simulated with FEA. Contact conditions with NEi Nastran automatically generated.

NEi Nastran’s capability for contact modeling includes the command CONTACTGENERATE. The user can easily add this single line command directly into the NEi Nastran input data file to instruct the program to automatically find, create and activate the appropriate surface contacts.

As an example of using ASCG, a FEA result from a manufacturing application of a lens mount fixture that accelerates on a set of linear slides is shown in Figure 3 with acceleration applied. Even with dissimilar meshes set up for each component of the assembly, the ASCG easily manages each surface contact pair automatically for the solution.

With NEi Nastran’s ASCG feature, the FE engineer now has the power of an accurate and economic (i.e. “easy”) solution for multiple component models that require integrated contact simulation.

Linear Surface Contact

NEi Nastran Surface Contact

Figure 4. Linkage assembly FEA made with surface contact definitions and run with linear solution sequence, SOL 101. As of NEi Nastran 9.1, surface contact works with the linear solution sequence and runs much faster (8x in this example) than with a non-linear solution sequence while attaining similar stress results in the areas of interest.

  • True 3D surface contact with closing and opening of gaps in core Nastran linear statics (SOL 101)
  • Iterative strategy saves hours of nonlinear run time
  • Works with Automated Surface Contact Generation (ASCG)
  • Makes linear gap elements obsolete
  • Ideal for large contact models that are initially in contact
  • Fast trade studies for bearing assemblies analyzed in minutes

NEi Nastran version 9.1 introduced the capability to utilize surface contact while running with the efficiency of the linear solution, SOL 101. When the FE model does not contain another nonlinearity, such as material plasticity or excess deformation, the FE engineer now has the option to run the FE model with surface contact and with the linear solver. This approach is designed to realize faster solution times while benefiting from surface contact accuracy as discussed above.

Figure 4 shows a test FEM with contact surfaces. In this test, the FEM ran over 8 times faster by utilizing the linear solution with this new capability versus running the same model with the non-linear (SOL 106) solution. Both runs were made using the same hardware: a standard Windows XP PC. Upon inspection of the output, the linear solution provided stress results similar to the non-linear solution to within 5% in the application’s area of interest.

Nonlinear Surface Contact

  • Free edges contacting surfaces now identified automatically
  • Edge to face welding carried out automatically
  • No element congruence required
  • Offsets and gaps between edges and faces are permissible
  • Rapid meshing of complex shell structures now possible
  • Ideal for large thin shell fabrications such as ship, aircraft, and automotive structures

Surface Contact Stabilization

  • Automatically stabilizes parts in contact by generating stabilization spring stiffness on the contact boundary
  • Default AUTO setting will stabilize parts with an initial gap opening greater than 1E-04 x model reference dimension
  • Parts can have initial gaps between contact without convergence issues
  • Can also improve convergence rate for models with friction
  • Stabilization limited to contact boundary which minimizes any errors in the solution due to presence of stabilization stiffness
  • CONTACTSTAB may be set to a multiplier to the stabilization stiffness calculated automatically allowing allows models that are either being under or over stiffened to be easily adjusted

Automated Surface Contact Generation (ASCG™)

  • Solver will search for element faces in contact and automatically setup the contact between discontinuous bodies
  • Can be used for automatically welding parts together or automatically defining nonlinear surface contact in complex regions
  • No geometry is required
  • Legacy Nastran models supported — ability to upgrade from legacy GAPs to surface contact with a single Case Control Command
  • Ability to weld parts together through a small gap automatically, which prevents manual definition of multiple master-slave regions with an offset
  • Self contact is now available using ASCG

Automated Weld Contact with Shells

Since NEi Nastran version 9.0, connecting two surfaces with dissimilar meshes has also been made easy, such as “welding” the surface of a tetrahedral mesh to the surface of a hex mesh. With NEi Nastran’s expanded suite of contact capabilities added in version 9.1, the FE engineer can now apply this powerful technique to weld shell elements together as well.

The capability to weld two dissimilar shell meshes together will save engineers many hours when working with extracted mid-plane models where it is common that meshes of the multiple surfaces do not line up by default. This feature will also prove useful in cases where CAD geometries comprising of multiple surfaces to be joined are not perfect.

Conclusion

Finite Element Analysis that utilizes contact simulation within a given FE model will tend to be more accurate than a simplified FE model that uses “assumed” load vectors and distributions. NEi Nastran version 10.0 expands upon existing contact simulation tools to add new features that not only provide a higher standard of accuracy, but also provide techniques that improve ease of use.

Product Flyers

PDFAutomated Contact Generation in NEi Nastran
PDFNEi Nastran Linear Contact

White Papers

telescopeThe following white paper is available in our Knowledge Base Center with sign up information.

PDFAutomated Surface Contact Generation (ASCG) Usage in NEi Nastran

Back to Top

Contact
Phone (U.S.): (877) - Nastran
Phone (International): +1 (714) 899-1220
Email: info@neisoftware.com
Site Map | Legal Notices | Privacy
Copyright © NEi Software. All Rights Reserved.